Tinotenda Hove – Opposition leader Michael Makaza of Freedom Fighters for Change has sharply criticised the public hearings on the Constitutional Amendment Bill, describing the process as flawed, exclusionary, and a betrayal of democratic principles.

Speaking on Wednesday, Makaza dismissed the outreach exercise as nothing more than a procedural formality designed to give the appearance of consultation while sidelining ordinary citizens.

In a strongly worded statement titled “FAIRNESS DENIED ON CAB3”, Makaza argued that the process failed to meet even the most basic standards of public participation.
“The public hearings on CAB3 failed a basic test of democracy: the people were not heard,” he said.

He outlined several concerns, accusing authorities of deliberately restricting access and limiting meaningful engagement. According to Makaza, many citizens who attempted to participate were effectively shut out.

“No real opportunity to speak. Venues were limited, slots were few, and many who traveled were turned away,” he said.

Makaza also condemned the short timeframe allocated for consultations, arguing that the process was rushed to avoid scrutiny.
“96 hours is not consultation. A matter this serious, with consequences for generations, cannot be rushed through in 4 days,” he said.

He further criticised the reliance on digital submissions, saying it ignored the realities faced by many Zimbabweans who lack access to reliable internet and devices.

“Digital barriers ignored. Saying ‘send an email’ ignores reality — many Zimbabweans have email addresses but no data, no devices, or no network. Consultation must meet people where they are,” he added.

Makaza warned that pushing the bill through under such conditions risks undermining public trust and legitimacy.

“A law passed without the people is a law against the people,” he said, calling for Parliament to halt the process and conduct proper, inclusive, and accessible hearings before proceeding.

The remarks add to growing criticism surrounding the Constitutional Amendment Bill, with concerns mounting over transparency, inclusivity, and the broader implications for Zimbabwe’s democratic framework.