Tinotenda Hove – A parliamentary public hearing on Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 of 2026 at Chidzikwe Business Centre in Masvingo District descended into chaos, with allegations of intimidation, selective participation, and outright violence overshadowing proceedings.

More than 600 people attended the meeting, but only one participant managed to openly oppose the proposed law, amid what critics described as a tightly controlled process dominated by ZANU PF supporters.

Lawyer Johannes Ruvengo faced a hostile reception as he presented his objections to the Bill. Witnesses said he was repeatedly interrupted, booed, and jeered while trying to make his submission. “He was not allowed to speak freely,” one observer said. “Every point he tried to raise was drowned out by noise.”

Tensions escalated further when opposition councillor Bernard Muchokwa attempted to take the floor. According to those present, he was physically confronted as he moved forward to speak. “He was pushed and shoved right in front of the Minister,” a witness said. “It quickly turned into an assault.”

The disturbances reportedly occurred in the presence of Masvingo Minister of State for Provincial Affairs and Devolution Ezra Chadzamira, raising questions about the conduct and oversight of the hearing.
Individuals alleged to have played key roles in orchestrating the disruptions included Esau Mutanho, identified as Minister Chadzamira’s driver. Mutanho, who is already facing charges related to disrupting a book launch, was seen actively engaging throughout the session. “He was moving around, coordinating and speaking to people, and at times consulting the Minister,” another witness said.

Also implicated was ZANU PF councillor Sengerai Manyanga, who reportedly controlled access to the microphone. Attendees claimed he selectively allowed contributions, ensuring that mostly ruling party supporters were heard. “The microphone was tightly controlled,” said one participant. “Only those aligned with ZANU PF were given a chance to speak.”

As a result of the hostile atmosphere and alleged threats, dissenting voices were largely silenced. “People were too intimidated to speak,” a source said. “In over two hours, only one person managed to oppose the Bill.”

The incident has sparked concern over the integrity of the public consultation process, with critics arguing that intimidation and violence have undermined what should be an open and democratic platform for citizen input.